Scorecards & Analysis
HeyMilo's intelligent scorecards provide structured, objective, and consistent evaluations of every candidate, making it easy to compare qualifications and make fair, confident, and data-driven hiring decisions.
What is a Scorecard?

A scorecard is a structured assessment that breaks down candidate performance into specific categories. It provides both quantitative scores and qualitative insights, helping you make well-informed decisions, providing:
Objective Evaluation: Consistent criteria applied to all candidates
Detailed Breakdown: Performance by competency area
Comparative Analysis: Easy comparison between candidates
Decision Support: Clear data to guide hiring choices
HeyMilo provides scoring and insights to support your hiring decisions, but it does not make decisions or automatically move candidates forward on your behalf. Final decisions always remain with your team.
Where Scorecards Appear

Scorecards are available inside each candidate profile, organized by interview stage, such as:
Resume Screening
Form Screening
Voice Interview
SMS Screening (if enabled)
Each stage contributes its own analysis. All candidate profiles will have Notes, Diagnostics, and Contact History tabs no matter what agents you have layered in.
How Question-Level Scoring Works
HeyMilo scores each candidate answer based on the criteria you set. For every interview question, your team defines what a great answer (score of 5) and a weak answer (score of 1) looks like, written in plain English. Our model uses those definitions, and the full transcript of the candidate’s response to assign a score from 1 to 5.
Here’s what to know:
you define what a 5 or 10 (strong) answer looks like
Our model figures out what a 2, 3, or 4 would be based on that range.
The model doesn’t learn from past responses. It only uses the rubric you give it.
You can keep your criteria broad and flexible to avoid being too strict or narrow.
Your team can update the rubric anytime.
You can always review and change any score manually.
This keeps scoring consistent at scale, while staying fully in your control and aligned with how your team already makes decisions.
Resume Screening Scorecards
Purpose: Evaluate whether a candidate’s resume meets role requirements before interviews.
Tabs You’ll See
Eligibility

Shows required qualifications you defined (Pass / Fail).
If enforcement is enabled, failing candidates are marked Not Eligible.
Examples:
minimum years of experience
certifications or licenses
required background
This tab controls eligibility, not ranking.
Scorecard

Evaluates resumes against scored criteria (1–10 per criterion), such as:
domain relevance
instructional depth
leadership exposure
Each score includes written reasoning.
Key Notes
Resume scores reflect what is written, not inferred ability
Eligibility and scoring are intentionally separate
Form Screening Scorecards
Purpose: Validate required information and enforce eligibility using structured form responses.
Tab You’ll See
Form Submission

Shows the candidate’s exact answers with clear Pass / Fail results.
For each question, you’ll see:
response type (Number, Slider, Text Area, Date)
the candidate’s answer
pass/fail outcome
whether it’s a dealbreaker
An overall form result appears at the top (e.g. Passed or Failed – Criteria not met).
Key Notes
Dealbreakers enforce non-negotiable requirements
Failed dealbreakers can block progression (if enforced)
Form screening controls eligibility, not ranking
SMS Screening Scorecards
Purpose: Quickly confirm must-have criteria in high-volume workflows.
Tabs You’ll See
SMS Transcription

Full text conversation with timestamps.
Key Notes
SMS screening is eligibility-focused
Used early in workflows
No free-form interpretation beyond defined criteria
Voice Interview Scorecards
Purpose: Evaluate how candidates explain, reason, and communicate using their own words.
Tabs You’ll See
Questions
Each interview question with:
candidate response
score
written explanation tied to the rubric
Scorecard

In this tab, you’ll see question by question break downs. You’ll see the candidates responses, assigned scores, and HeyMilo’s findings based off your predefined criteria for fast evaluation.

In the profile you’ll see their overall interview score (out of 100), aggregating question-level scores.
Communication

Shows a communication assessment based on the candidate’s spoken responses.
You’ll see:
a Speech Score (out of 5)
structured feedback explaining:
clarity and coherence
grammar and sentence structure
vocabulary appropriateness
overall communicative effectiveness
short quoted examples from the interview with timestamps
Key Notes
Communication scoring evaluates how answers are expressed, not what was said
It does not affect question scores or eligibility
It is informational and intended to support human review
Extracted Tags

Structured data (e.g. years of experience, attributes).
Tags are informational only and do not affect scores.
Audio / Video

Listen to the time-synced playback with jump controls.
No facial, tone, accent, or appearance analysis is used for scoring.
Diagnostics & Integrity (Optional)
Purpose: Provide technical and process-level context about how an interview was completed, not what the candidate said. Diagnostics are informational only. They do not automatically pass, fail, or score candidates.
Device & Environment Summary

Shows the technical environment used during the interview, including:
device type (e.g. desktop or mobile)
operating system and browser
timezone and interview time
general location (city and country)
Why this matters
This helps teams:
confirm interviews were completed in expected environments
resolve technical questions
support audit or compliance reviews
No personal device data beyond what is shown is collected or inferred.
Evaluator Processing Times

Displays how long each evaluation component took to process, such as:
interview scorecard generation
communication analysis
tag extraction
resume and form evaluation
Why this matters
This provides transparency into:
system performance
processing completion
when results became available
These timings do not affect scores or outcomes.
Cheat Detection Overview (If Enabled)

Provides high-level integrity signals related to interview completion.
You may see:
a confidence score
counts for detected events (e.g. multiple people, response delay, phone detection)
Important
These signals are informational
They do not automatically disqualify candidates
They are intended to support human review
Interview Completion Status

Shows whether the interview was completed, including:
completion threshold (e.g. at least 70%)
resume upload status
form submission status (if applicable)
Why this matters
This helps teams quickly verify:
whether the interview was fully completed
which components were finished or missing
whether follow-up or nudging is needed
Candidate Feedback
Displays any feedback the candidate chose to submit after completing the interview.
This section may be empty if no feedback was provided.
Key Notes
Diagnostics provide context, not decisions
No automatic actions are taken based on diagnostics
All signals require human interpretation
Notes Tab (All Agents)

Purpose: Add notes for team collaboration.
Internal notes
Star ratings or thumbs up/down
Not visible to candidates
Not used in scoring
Contact History Tab

Purpose: Easily track timelines and see what's been sent to the candidate for communication transparency.
Shows:
emails
SMS
interview invitations
timestamps
Useful for audits and follow-ups.
Analytics: Seeing the Bigger Picture
The Analytics section gives you a broader view of candidate performance across roles and time periods. It’s designed to help you spot trends, benchmark success rates, and optimise your interview process.

What Analytics Shows
candidate volume by stage
completion rates
performance trends
per-question patterns
spend and estimated savings
If no interviews have run, analytics clearly show No data.
🧠 Common Use Cases
Task
Action
Review a candidate's performance in detail
Open their Scorecard link.
Compare average candidate scores for a job
View Candidates
Identify which interview questions work best
Review "Scorecard" in Analysis.
Export a list of shortlisted candidates
Use filters + Export in either Scorecard or Dashboard.
Interpreting Scorecard Results
Overall Score Analysis
Understanding composite ratings:
90-100: Exceptional candidate, immediate consideration
80-89: Strong candidate, likely good fit
70-79: Solid candidate, worth further evaluation
60-69: Average candidate, consider development needs
Below 60: Likely not suitable for role
Category Performance Patterns
Look for specific patterns:
Balanced Performance: Consistent scores across categories
Standout Strengths: Exceptional performance in key areas
Critical Gaps: Weaknesses in essential competencies
Development Opportunities: Areas for growth and training
Weighted Scoring Impact
Understanding how importance affects results:
Critical Skills: Higher weight, greater impact on overall score
Nice-to-Have: Lower weight, less influence on total
Knockout Criteria: Automatic disqualifiers regardless of other scores
Bonus Points: Additional credit for exceptional qualifications
Comparative Analysis
Candidate Ranking
Use scorecards to rank candidates:
Sort by Overall Score: Quick identification of top performers
Category Comparison: Compare specific competencies
Fit Analysis: Match candidates to role requirements
Team Needs: Consider current team composition
Benchmark Comparison
Compare against standards:
Role Requirements: Minimum acceptable performance levels
Industry Standards: Typical performance for similar roles
Company Benchmarks: Internal standards and expectations
Historical Data: Performance of successful hires
Side-by-Side Analysis
Compare multiple candidates directly:
Strengths Comparison: Identify unique advantages
Gap Analysis: Understand relative weaknesses
Fit Assessment: Determine best match for role
Risk Evaluation: Consider potential concerns
Using Scorecards for Decision Making
Decision Framework
Structured approach to candidate evaluation:
Review Overall Scores: Initial ranking and filtering
Analyze Critical Categories: Focus on must-have skills
Consider Team Needs: Factor in current capabilities
Evaluate Growth Potential: Assess development opportunities
Make Informed Decision: Combine data with judgment
Next Steps Based on Scores
Action recommendations by score range:
High Performers (85+)
Fast-track to interview: Priority scheduling
Prepare compelling offer: Competitive package
Assign senior interviewer: Appropriate level engagement
Check references early: Accelerate process
Strong Candidates (70-84)
Standard interview process: Normal progression
Prepare targeted questions: Focus on development areas
Consider team fit: Evaluate interpersonal dynamics
Plan development path: Growth opportunities
Borderline Candidates (60-69)
Additional screening: Phone or video pre-interview
Specific skill assessment: Targeted evaluation
Consider alternative roles: Better fit opportunities
Development requirements: Training and support needs
Below Threshold (<60)
Decline politely: Professional rejection
Provide feedback: Constructive development suggestions
Keep for future: Different role opportunities
Talent pool: Long-term relationship building
Common Scorecard Mistakes
❌ Over-Reliance on Scores
Avoid these pitfalls:
Ignoring Context: Scores don't tell the complete story
Missing Nuance: Unique circumstances and potential
Rigid Thresholds: Inflexible cutoff points
Overlooking Fit: Cultural and team considerations
❌ Misinterpreting Results
Common misunderstandings:
Single Category Focus: Overemphasizing one area
Score Inflation: Expecting unrealistic perfection
Comparison Errors: Inappropriate benchmarking
Timing Issues: Not considering experience level
❌ Process Problems
Operational challenges:
Inconsistent Application: Varying standards across roles
Outdated Criteria: Not updating with role evolution
Poor Communication: Not sharing insights with team
Lack of Follow-up: Not tracking hiring outcomes
Advanced Scorecard Features
Predictive Analytics
Use historical data to improve accuracy:
Success Patterns: Identify characteristics of top performers
Risk Indicators: Recognize warning signs early
Trend Analysis: Understand changing requirements
Optimization: Continuously improve evaluation criteria
Integration Capabilities
Connect with other systems:
ATS Integration: Seamless workflow with existing tools
HRIS Connection: Link to employee performance data
Reporting Tools: Advanced analytics and insights
Team Collaboration: Shared evaluation and feedback
Bias Reduction
Promote fair and objective evaluation:
Structured Criteria: Consistent evaluation standards
Blind Scoring: Remove identifying information during evaluation
Multiple Perspectives: Team-based assessment
Regular Calibration: Ensure consistent application
Pro Tip: The best scorecards combine objective data with human insight. Use scores as a starting point, but always consider the complete candidate picture.
Sharing Reports with Candidates
If you’d like to give candidates visibility into their results, you can easily share their interview reports with them:

When Email Report to Candidate is enabled, candidates automatically receive an email with a link to view and download their interview report (PDF) after completing the interview. The report includes the same scoring and analysis your team sees.

This can also be enabled after agent creation under Agent Config → Advanced Settings.
🔐 Data Privacy & Access
Scorecard and Analytics features are secure, GDPR-compliant/SOC2 certified, and accessible only to users with proper permissions. Ensure your team has the right access level to collaborate effectively.
📬 Need Help?
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our support team [email protected], visit the Help section or contact your Customer Success Manager directly.
Last updated



